HARD MADE EASY
Lets consider a simple case which shows how our understanding of Rational Numbers is based (mainly) on our knowledge of the integers.
(Generalized) Question 1: If and are rational numbers that are not squares of other rational numbers, show that is not rational.
This seems hard to approach, because there seem to be a lot of unknowns, and we could be unfamiliar with what rational numbers are. Let’s try the following:
Question 2: If and are integers that are not squares of other integers, show that is not an integer.
Now, this is more friendly, but still a little tricky. In the spirit of this post, let’s make it even easier.
Question 3: If is an integer that is not the square of another integer, show that is not an integer.
Now this is almost silly, and seems to be just a play on words. The proper way to prove this statement that doesn’t make my head run around in circles, is to show the contrapositive – To show that , it is equivalent to show the contrapositive which is .
Proof: If is an integer , then , which is the square of the integer .
Now, what is the generalized version?
(Generalized) Question 4: If is a rational number that is not the square of another rational number, show that is not a rational number.
Proof: Test Yourself 1.
Corollary: If is an integer such that is rational, then must be the square of an integer.
Proof: From Question 4, we know that y must be the square of a rational with . Hence , and the only way for this to be an integer is , so .
Now, back to question 2.
Proof: Suppose is an integer. Consider . Squaring both sides, we obtain that , so this means that is rational. By the corollary above, must be an square. Similarly, must be an square. Hence we are done.
And finally, back to question 1.
Proof: Proof by contradiction. Suppose such that , where are all integers. Then, . This contradicts question 2!
Corollary: If and are rational numbers such that is rational, then and are both rational.
The slightly surprising result, is that in simplifying Question 1 to Question 2, we ended up using Question 2 to prove Question 1. In fact, as is often the case with rational numbers, it is sufficient to consider the integer case, and then clear out denominators by multiplying throughout.
Get A Try & Test Yourself
1. Complete the proof of Question 4.
2. Prove that if , and are rational numbers such that is rational, then , and are all rational. How many terms can you show this for?
3. How many ordered triples of integers are there such that ?
4. (**) Prove that if are rational numbers such that is rational, then and are all rational. Note: This is extremely hard, and not approachable by the methods discussed in this post.
No comments:
Post a Comment