Monday, 30 April 2012

Maths - Pointless

Theorem :
         All numbers are equal
Proof :
       Consider any two numbers a and b . Let t = a + b


a + b = t
(a+b)(a-b)=(a-b)t            [Multiply (a-b) on both sides]
a^2 - b^2 = ta - tb
a^2 - ta  = b^2 - tb
a^2 - ta +(t/2)^2 = b^2 - tb +(t/2)^2
                             [Add (t/2)^2 on both sides]
(a-t/2)^2=(b-t/2)^2
a - t/2 = b - t/2            [Take square root on both sides]
a = b




  So All Numbers Are Equal . Maths Is Pointless .
      This is also from the feild of mathematical fallacy . Try to find the fallacy if you can .

4 Equals 5

Theorem: 4 = 5
Proof:
-20 = -20
16 - 36 = 25 - 45
4^2 - 9*4 = 5^2 - 9*5
4^2 - 9*4 + 81/4 = 5^2 - 9*5 + 81/4
(4 - 9/2)^2 = (5 - 9/2)^2
4 - 9/2 = 5 - 9/2
4 = 5

Dollar Equals Cent

Theorem: 1$ = 1c.
Proof:
And another that gives you a sense of money disappearing.

1$ = 100c
= (10c)^2
= (0.1$)^2
= 0.01$
= 1c

Here $ means dollars and c means cents. This one is scary in that no one was able to see what was wrong with this one. If you can please comment it  and I will correct myself . I will correct my fallacy .

Numbers equal zero

Theorem : All numbers are equal to zero.

Proof: Let that a=b. Then
a = b
a^2 = ab
a^2 - b^2 = ab - b^2
(a + b)(a - b) = b(a - b)
a + b = b
a = 0

Furthermore if a + b = b, and a = b (given) , then b + b = b, and 2b = b, which mean that 2 = 1.





Here the fallacy is in the 4th step .
If 4*0 = 5*0 , we cannot say that 4 = 5 by cancelling zeros .

Every Natural Number can be Unambiguously Described in Fourteen Words or Less

The claim is that any natural number can be completely and unambiguously identified in fourteen words or less. Here a "word" means an ordinary English word, such as you might find in a dictionary.
You know this can't be true. After all, there are only finitely many words in the English language, so there are only finitely many sentences that can be built using fourteen words or less.
So it can't possibly be true that every natural number can be unambiguously described by such a sentence. After all, there are infinitely many natural numbers, and only finitely many such sentences!
And yet, here's a supposed "proof" of that claim. Can you figure out what's wrong with it?
The flaw is so subtle that it's not simply a matter of an obvious mathematical error in one of the steps. So we won't present this proof in the same way as the other ones in this collection. Rather than choosing a particular step and having the computer tell you if you're right or wrong, just try your best to figure out where the fallacy lies. When you've thought about it all you can, look at the A Discussion of the Fallacysection to see if you were correct or not.
The Fallacious Proof:
  1. Suppose there is some natural number which cannot be unambiguously described in fourteen words or less.
  2. Then there must be a smallest such number. Let's call it n.
  3. But now n is "the smallest natural number that cannot be unambiguously described in fourteen words or less".
  4. This is a complete and unambiguous description of n in fourteen words, contradicting the fact that n was supposed not to have such a description!
  5. Since the assumption (step 1) of the existence of a natural number that cannot be unambiguously described in fourteen words or less led to a contradiction, it must be an incorrect assumption.
  6. Therefore, all natural numbers can be unambiguously described in fourteen words or less!
When you have thought about this all you can and want to see a solution, go to the section A Discussion of the Fallacy.

0 Equals to 2



Consider the equation
\cos^2x=1-\sin^2x
which holds as a consequence of the Pythagorean theorem. Then, by taking a square root,
\cos x = (1-\sin^2x)^{1/2}
so that
1+\cos x = 1+(1-\sin^2x)^{1/2}.
But evaluating this when x = π implies
1-1 = 1+(1-0)^{1/2}
or
0=2
which is absurd.
The error in each of these examples fundamentally lies in the fact that any equation of the form
x^2 = a^2
has two solutions, provided a ≠ 0,
x=\pm a


Here , the fallacy has occurred .

Dissection Fallacy


A dissection fallacy is an apparent paradox arising when two plane figures with different areas seem to be composed by the same finite set of parts. In order to produce this illusion, the pieces have to be cut and reassembled so skillfully, that the missing or exceeding area is hidden by tiny, negligible imperfections of shape.
DissectionFallacyA strikingly simple and enlightening example can be constructed by dissecting an 8×8 checkerboard in four pieces as depicted (left figure). The middle and right figures then seem to demonstrate that the same pieces can give rise to two different polygons having area5×13=65 and 2(5×6)+3=63, respectively. This would imply that 63=64=65.
DissectionFallacyDistancesHowever, a closer look at the slanted sides of the trapezoidal and triangular pieces shows that they cannot be aligned as implied in the above fallacious illustrations. In fact, they are the diagonals of two dissimilar rectangles of sizes 2×5 and 3×8, respectively, and hence have distinct slopes. But the difference of the ratios (2/5=0.4 versus 3/8=0.375) is too small to be perceived by the eye.
Note that the dissection cuts the sides of the 8×8 squares according to the proportion 5:3. The illusion becomes even more effective if the numbers 3, 5, 8 are replaced by a triple of higher consecutive Fibonacci numbers.

Mathematical Fallacy

                     To all our knowledge Mathematics always has a major role in all kinds of fields in this world and it is the reason for its fame . But off to our knowledge many mathematical suggestions made by many Mathematicians lead to the formation of mistaken proofs . All these false proofs are placed under a separate mathematical field called MATHEMATICAL FALLACY . Few of these False proofs have been corrected ; some are replaced ; some are banned .
                     In mathematics, certain kinds of mistaken proof are often exhibited, and sometimes collected, as illustrations of a concept of mathematical fallacy. There is a distinction between a simple mistake and a mathematical fallacy in a proof: a mistake in a proof leads to an invalid proof just in the same way, but in the best-known examples of mathematical fallacies, there is some concealment in the presentation of the proof. For example the reason validity fails may be a division by zero that is hidden by algebraic notation. There is a striking quality of the mathematical fallacy: as typically presented, it leads not only to an absurd result, but does so in a crafty or clever way. Therefore these fallacies, for pedagogic reasons, usually take the form of spurious proofs of obvious contradictions. Although the proofs are flawed, the errors, usually by design, are comparatively subtle, or designed to show that certain steps are conditional, and should not be applied in the cases that are the exceptions to the rules.

Easy Multiply

In Mathematics , multiplication is very easy when we consider multiplication by 11 or squaring a two-digit number ending with 5.
 



Multiplication By 11 :


          Lets consider an example 26 * 11


(i)Separate the two digits.                 2_6
(ii)Add the two digits together.            2 + 6 = 8
(iii)Put the sum between two digits.        8 6
               So 26 * 11 = 286


         If the sum of two digits is greater than 9 , you have to carry a 1 and add it to the first digit .
                Example 84 * 11                              


       (8+4 = 12)                           8 12* 4
        
          *The sum of two digits is greater than 9 , so carry the 1 and add it to the 8 . The final answer is 924 .




Squaring A Two-Digit Number Ending With 5 :


                Example 75 * 75     


(i)Multiply the first digit by one more than itself . (One more than 7 is 8)
                7 * 8 = 56
(ii)Put 25 after the answer .(The answer will always end in 25)
                    5625
               So 7 * 8 = 5625
ENJOY MATHEMATICS !!!

Walk Through A Piece Of Paper

Do you know that u can cut a hole in a piece of notebook paper big enough for you to walk through ? Does it sound impossible ? Lets make it POSSIBLE


REQUIREMENT :


       (i)Scissors             (ii)A Ruler
       (iii)An 21.5cm x 28cm piece of paper


PROCEDURE :


(i)Fold a piece of paper in half from top to bottom.


(ii)Start cutting along the folded edge . Make 8 parallel cuts about 2.5cm (1 inch) apart . Do not cut all the way to the open edge . Stop cutting about 2.5cm (1 inch) from the edge of the paper .


(iii)Now start cutting along the open edge . Make 7 parallel cuts in the middle of 8 cuts . Again , stop cutting about 2.5cm       (1 inch) from the edge of the paper . 


(iv)Carefully unfold the paper and then flatten it out . Cut through all the folds except the two end sections .


(v)If you carefully stretch out the paper , you should be able to walk right through it!




SECRET :
        
      Its the work of topology . topology has helped you solve a problem that first seemed impossible

Ring & Rope




Lets take a topological study on a rope and a ring and take of the ring from the knot of rope





Coat Demo

Lets take a topological study over a cloth and try to remove our inner coat without removing our outer coat




Illustrations For Topology


Topology - The Study Of Shapes & Objects    has   laid   path   to  performance  of    many   magical  illustrations & tricks




                      


                                                                        In    this   video   ,   the    topological   study    on     a     rope     is    made    and      a   knot      is      made      without     letting    the    knots     go   into    one    another

Topology


                In  the  vast   field   of   MATHEMATICS   ,    one  of   the    fields     I    like   the    most   is    the    field    of     TOPOLOGY   .  This   is   the   major   field    where    one   can   see    many    tactical     magics    or   tricks   .


                Topology is considered a modern version of geometry with all sorts of spaces and dimensions. According to Eric Weisstein at Wolfram Research , a more precise definition of topology is the "study of spatial objects such as curves, surfaces, the space we call our universe, the space-time of general relativity, fractals, knots, manifolds, phase spaces that are encountered in physics, and symmetry groups like the collection of ways of rotating a top, etc." These topological spaces appear everywhere, making topology one of the great unifying ideas in mathematics.

   A Mobius Strip (David Benbennick)

            Topology is the study of the mathematical properties that remain the same when you deform an object without tearing a hold in it or gluing sections of it together. The study of topology is a lesson in precision in continuous objects.

  Topological objects are independent of their representation or how they are embedded in space-time. Therefore a doughnut (otherwise known as a torus) can be deformed into a coffee cup as can be seen in the image above and the two objects are "topologically equivalent" or homeomorphic. Another example is the set of all of the positions of an hour hand on a clock is topologically equivalent to a circle.

   Branches of Topology
          *

            There are four different branches of topology.

            General topology defines basic notions and theorems in topology, such as open and closed sets, continuous functions, neighborhoods and connectedness.

            Algebraic topology concerns intrinsic properties of spatial objects that do not change under certain types of transformations. The term "algebraic" is given due to the use of algebraic objects such as groups and rings.

            Geometric topology studies manifolds and mappings between them.

            Differential topology deals with differentiable functions on differentiable manifolds and is closely related to the field of differential geometry.
      
Topological geometry -- also known as topology -- is one of the newest of the major branches of mathematics, although its roots go back several hundred years. Before topology, mathematics was often defined as "the science of quantity,," but topology changed that. Distance has little or no meaning in topology, and squares and circles are usually considered the same shape. Topology studies more fundamental mathematical attributes.

   Topology is sometimes called "rubber sheet geometry," because topology replaces the rigid plane of classical geometry with a rubber sheet. Squares are considered the same as circles, because squares can be continuously transformed into circles without tearing or breaking. Topologist look for more fundamental distinctions -- like holes. One of the classifications of geometrical objects is genus -- the number of holes in the object. Squares and circles are both genus 0 -- no holes. Donuts and coffee cups are identical, as they are both genus 1. A coffee cup with ho handle, however, would be genus 0.